Saturday 26 January 2013

Embarrassing way of Thai 囧《人再囧途之泰囧》难得的会心一笑





要不是因为票房出乎意外的惊人,也不会想去看《人再囧途之泰囧》。或许,这个就是“羊群效应”,虽然不知道为什么要进场,可是人人都进场,固然就会是好剧的心理盲点。有趣的是,前传《人在囧途》我居然也看过,所以很容易就会发现,其实两部剧都是换汤不换药。

那么何以此剧会黑马胜出,我想这个和外景有着系系相关的影响。如果外景是欧洲国家,反倒会有种疏离感。泰剧在国内盛行,也为此剧做了推手,毕竟泰国和韩国相较,还是泰国比较有亲切感。

有别于周星驰式的无厘头,徐峥是走大陆式的现实主义喜剧。故事就像,乡村老鼠和城市老鼠漂流记。在异乡,两人披肩而行,是传统的男人戏。如果勉强要说女主角,那么就只有范冰冰的客串而已。笑说,此剧绝无爱情,即使有也只有基情而已。

像这样的片,简单说,其实新加坡和大马有不少,实在不明白何以大卖。说是喜剧嘛,其实它并不能让你开怀大笑,尽其量也是会心一笑。唯一可以解析,那么就是他接地气。当然,大家也看腻了大制作且剧情空洞的大片。走平民路线,走大众化,至少得到蚁民的共鸣。虽说,没有国那有家,没有家那有你,只是,如果家人的感受都照顾不好,还有什么资格说爱国。在这个勾心斗角的社会里面,能看见或遇见单纯如主角也是一种福气。

If it were not because of the amazing box office unexpectedly, also will not want to go to the "embarrassing way of Thai embarrassing. Perhaps, this is the "herding" We do not know why you want to approach, but everyone approach, of course, will be a good drama psychological blind spot. Interesting prequel "embarrassing way" I actually seen, so it will find, in fact, two of the drama is a new name.

So why this play will be the dark horse to win, I think this location has a Department of the Department-related effects. If the location is a European country, and have actually kind of alienation. Thai drama prevailed in the country, do play push hands, after all, Thailand and South Korea compared to Thailand's more intimacy.

Unlike Stephen Chow does not make sense, Xu Zheng walk Continental realism comedy. The story is like, rural Mouse and the City Mouse Crusoe. Line in a foreign land, two shawls, traditional men play. If reluctantly say heroine, only Fan Bingbing cameo. Laughs, the play absolutely love, even if only the base situation.

Like this piece, simple fact, Singapore and Malaysia have a lot, really do not understand why the big sell. That is a comedy thing, in fact, it does not make you laugh, the best of the amount, is knowing smile. Only can resolve then his ground gas. Of course, we are also tired of watching the big production and large plot hole. Go the civilian route, take the popular least ants resonance. Although, there is no country home, home that you just, if the feelings of the family members to take care of the poor, what qualified to say patriotic. Could see the inside of the intrigue of the society, or to meet the simple, such as the main character is a blessing.

Oh My God! (2012) 偶滴神啊OMG


偶滴神啊 - 剧情

  影片讲述的是一个古玩店主Kanjibhai的故事。对于他来说,神灵和宗教无非就是个经商命题。他低价购进看起来年代久远的宗教神像,再以原价格的10倍卖出去。而那些容易上当受骗的信徒们却真以为这些是百年罕见的历史出土文物。所以,神对他来说最重要的作用就是最大的赚钱招牌。她的妻子和他截然不同,她是个虔诚的人,她尽自己最大的努力希望能弥补丈夫对神灵的亵渎。突然有一天,地震毁了他的古董店,他开始不信神了...



阿克谢·库玛尔一直是我喜欢的偶像,因此也是为了他才看此剧。只可惜,《偶滴神啊》他演的神并不是故事的主角。相对于,一直饰演配角的帕莱什·拉瓦尔,饰演挑战神的角色,相当到位。以销售神像为主的商人,一直不相信神并嘲笑朝拜“神”并不让人意外。因为,没有被“神”兼顾的人实在太多,会产生质疑并不让人意外。就像,现在的政局,有被国家政府真正照顾到的又有几人。

最让我意外的,还是印度法庭居然会接受主角的案子。当大家都觉得,主角的冒犯行为是活该,自私自利又不尊重神的行为很荒唐。当老天也要惩罚他的时候,他居然还可以理智的去保险索赔。对他的好感不期然的在提升着,当他对保险公司,对神的质疑做出提控时,也产生着共鸣和认同。确实,保险公司是不对天灾人祸做出补偿的,可是保险不就是保障难以预计的危险吗?人们每天虔诚的去拜神,为什么神要去惩罚无辜的人呢?其中,神和人之间的中介,“神媒”自然就是该负责任的一方。我们一直被主角和电影牵着鼻子走,只因为他的奇特点子和辩才。

不过,以局外人来看,借着神为赚钱工具的主角,难道就真的不应该受到惩罚?他和那些神媒又有些什么分别。如果不是他的利益受到伤害和威胁,他会站出来做出控诉吗?换是别人控诉他的话,主角又会怎么说呢?他不辞神媒诈财的行为,他每天的生意不也是“借神发财”。主角不应该是英雄,尽其量他只能算是一个人,一个再平凡不过,不愿意向命运低头的人。把神的角色换为政府,把人民代议士带入为“神媒”,那么主角的角色还是一位平凡的商人,就像我们一样,每天在售卖着我们的才能。直到一天,老天要惩罚我们,我们也变得无可奈何。

主角虽然有点愤青,不过他说的确实也是事实。至少他是一个愿意究根到底的人,他会问,倒掉的牛奶到那去?为什么,人居然愿意把牛奶倒给神像也不愿意把牛奶送给寺庙外的乞丐。笑,为什么?因为,他们相信神可以给予他们保障和利用,而乞丐什么都无法回报他们。或许说,我们不应该推崇施舍乞讨文化,不过更应该检讨朝拜行贿文化。正如,“神”自己说的,其实他需要的并不是这些。相反,神因人而存在,而不是因为有神才产生信仰,只要人有良知,信仰也自然会产生。

记得在某部电影里面,有句经典的对白是谈论到神的,他说:“什么是神?神就是能做到,平凡人无法做到的事情。”(大意如此)此话更深一层意思,可以体现在此剧。当主角遇难时,他说,能在他失去房子时给予他房子,在他无法温饱时给予他食物,在神死边缘给予挽手的就是他的神。而提供这一切的,在我们日常生活里面的并不是神,而是“朋友”。“神”自己也说他是人的朋友,而不是偶像。因为,只有身边的朋友,才会最清楚咱们的需要。能及时给予挽助的朋友,已经远超于神可以做的。因此,好好珍惜身边的朋友吧!

Akshay Kumar & Paresh Rawal has always been my favorite idol, and therefore also for him to see the play. Unfortunately, "Oudi God to his speech of God is not the protagonist of the story. With respect, has always played the supporting role of the Pales Lawal, played the role of the challenges God quite a place. Sales statues based businessman, has been not to believe in God and to ridicule worship "God" is not surprising. Not be both "God" too many people, the question is not surprising. Like the Council, to really take care of the national government and several people.

Me the most unexpected Indian court actually accept the case of the protagonist. When we all feel, the protagonist of offensive behavior deserve selfishness without respect for God's behavior is absurd. When God should punish him, he can actually also sensible to go insurance claims. Hold it against him could not help in upgrading to make charges against his insurance company, questioned God, but also generate sympathy and recognition. Indeed, the insurance company is not right insurance protection is difficult to predict the risk of natural and man-made disasters to compensate, but it? The daily devout people to worship, why God going to punish innocent people? Intermediary between God and man, "God media" nature is the responsible party. Protagonist and movies we have been led by the nose, only because of his strange ideas and eloquence.

However, as an outsider view, by God money tools protagonist, it really should not be punished? He and those god media there, what, respectively. If not harm his interests and threats, he will stand up to make a complaint? Change others accusing him, the protagonist would be how do you say? He endure the to God the media Zhacai behavior, his daily business is "by God to get rich. Protagonist should not be a hero, do its amount can only be regarded as a person, an ordinary However, people do not want to bow to fate. To change God's role for the government, the elected representatives of the people into God media ", then the role of the protagonist or an extraordinary businessman, just like we do every day selling we can. Until one day, God wants to punish us, we become helpless.

Protagonist, although a bit angry youth, but he said that indeed is a fact. At least he is a willing to study root in the end, he will ask, the drained milk going there? Why, the man was willing poured the milk to the statue also do not want to put the milk given to beggars outside the temple. Laugh, why? Because they believe that God can give them protection and utilization, and the beggar what they are unable to return. Might say, we should not be admired to alms begging cultures, but more should be review worship bribery culture. Just as, "God said to myself, in fact, he need not. Instead, God people exist, rather than to generate faith because God only, as long as a person with a conscience, belief naturally produces.

Remember the inside of a movie is a classic dialogue is talking about God, he said: "What is God? God is able to do, and ordinary people can not do things." (Effect) remark deeper meaning can be reflected in the play. When the protagonist is killed, he said, when he lost the house to give his house to give him food, he could not have enough to eat and wear, edge given to the death of God the Wanshou is his God. Provide all of this, in our daily life inside is not God, but a "friend." "God himself said that he is the friend of the people, not the idol. Because only her friends, will be the most aware of our needs. Timely given harness to help a friend, has been far more than God can do. Therefore, cherish her friends!