有人说，2012之后，是踏入精神层面的年代。从《天与地》关于人吃人的题材，到《少年派》里面用童话般的故事去美化人性。我开始有点相信，我们已经开始撤离，丧尸和魔法少年的年代。正视自己的信仰，面对和接受人性可怕的一面，是导演希望表达的。
刚看完《我的神啊》一部质疑信仰的电影，再观看《少年派》，不难发现他们相似逗趣的地方，都是他们用最浅白，貌似童话般诉说着严肃的信仰问题。他们让观众可以用另一个角度，观感去体会出一些让我们感到愤怒和不平的事实。
华人有句：“初生牛犊不怕虎”，当里面的小犊变成一只老虎后，他还会害怕老虎吗？由于每个人的信仰都不一样，因此很难去评价人和生命的价值。正如很多人都说，“现代”的宫廷戏，都是在反映“现代”社会的人性，因此得到热棒。而当少年童话，反映成，成人的生存历程下，再成熟的人也都凌可相信，这个世界上是真的有“神”。
如果说信仰造就了战争，那么毫无信仰创造出来的就是出卖人性。李安这部《少年派》和他过去的作品都难以得到我的共鸣，大概是因为我们的信仰并不一样。虽然我喜欢童话故事，但是喜欢童话并不相等于接受童话。从质疑历史到质疑信仰，从坚守原则到放弃原则，再重整自己的一套人生哲理。我们都不得不承认，不管是当个神，还是人吃人，套句：“当个活着的禽兽，还是当死去的好人”，我们都不断在说服自己，把自己的行为合理化。
大家过去所信仰的，“善有善报，恶有恶报”等等的说法，已经无法再恐吓谁了。如果一个人无法和自己成为朋友，就像少年和老虎一样，即使天不亡你，那个人也活不长。反之，为了生存，渴望生产，人吃人又算得了什么。当天不助你，人总要自救，只要能活下，才能证明神是存在的。而人对生命的渴求，往往是超乎人自己可以想象的。对于信仰不也是一样吗？人可以为了自己的信仰失去自己的性命，也能为了别人的信仰牺牲自己。说到底，我们都不过想证明，自己的信仰是正确的。
It is said that after 2012, entered the era of the spiritual dimension. Cannibalism theme from "heaven and earth" to "young faction" inside story with a fairy tale to beautify humanity. I began to believe that a little bit, we had begun to leave, the young age of zombies and magic. To face up to their own beliefs, to face and accept humanity terrible, the director wanted to express.
Just finished watching the movie "O my God" a questioning of faith, and then watch the "Young School", it is not difficult to find them similar funny place, are they using the most plain, looks like a fairy-tale tells of the serious issues of faith. They allow the audience to another point of view, the perception can be used to understand the fact that we are angry and uneven.
Chinese saying: "fearless", inside the calves into a tiger, he will be afraid of the tiger? Since each person's faith is not the same, so it is difficult to evaluate and the value of life. As a lot of people say, the palace of the "modern" opera, are reflecting the humanity of the "modern" society, so to get a hot rod. When a juvenile fairy tales reflect adult survival course, mature people are Ling can believe that this world is really "God".
If faith created a war, then there is no belief in creation is the seller. Ang Lee 'Junior School "and he works hard to get past my sympathy, probably because our beliefs are not the same. Although I like a fairy tale, but like the fairy tale is not equivalent to accept the fairy tale. Questioned history to question the beliefs, stick to our principles to give up the principle of reforming its own set of philosophies of life. We all have to admit that, whether it is as a god, or cannibalism, a blessing or a curse: "When beasts alive or dead good man, we are constantly convince myself to rationalize their behavior.
We have faith, "what goes around, comes around," and so to say, has been unable to intimidate anyone. If a person can not become friends, like teenagers and Tiger, even if the day is not dead you, man may not live long. Conversely, in order to survive, the desire for production, cannibalism what did it matter. The day does not help you, people always want to help themselves, can live under in order to prove that God is there. The people thirst for life, often than people can imagine. For faith is not the same? People can lose their lives for their faith, to sacrifice themselves for the beliefs of others. In the final analysis, we are nothing but want to prove that their own beliefs are correct.
刚看完《我的神啊》一部质疑信仰的电影，再观看《少年派》，不难发现他们相似逗趣的地方，都是他们用最浅白，貌似童话般诉说着严肃的信仰问题。他们让观众可以用另一个角度，观感去体会出一些让我们感到愤怒和不平的事实。
华人有句：“初生牛犊不怕虎”，当里面的小犊变成一只老虎后，他还会害怕老虎吗？由于每个人的信仰都不一样，因此很难去评价人和生命的价值。正如很多人都说，“现代”的宫廷戏，都是在反映“现代”社会的人性，因此得到热棒。而当少年童话，反映成，成人的生存历程下，再成熟的人也都凌可相信，这个世界上是真的有“神”。
如果说信仰造就了战争，那么毫无信仰创造出来的就是出卖人性。李安这部《少年派》和他过去的作品都难以得到我的共鸣，大概是因为我们的信仰并不一样。虽然我喜欢童话故事，但是喜欢童话并不相等于接受童话。从质疑历史到质疑信仰，从坚守原则到放弃原则，再重整自己的一套人生哲理。我们都不得不承认，不管是当个神，还是人吃人，套句：“当个活着的禽兽，还是当死去的好人”，我们都不断在说服自己，把自己的行为合理化。
大家过去所信仰的，“善有善报，恶有恶报”等等的说法，已经无法再恐吓谁了。如果一个人无法和自己成为朋友，就像少年和老虎一样，即使天不亡你，那个人也活不长。反之，为了生存，渴望生产，人吃人又算得了什么。当天不助你，人总要自救，只要能活下，才能证明神是存在的。而人对生命的渴求，往往是超乎人自己可以想象的。对于信仰不也是一样吗？人可以为了自己的信仰失去自己的性命，也能为了别人的信仰牺牲自己。说到底，我们都不过想证明，自己的信仰是正确的。
Just finished watching the movie "O my God" a questioning of faith, and then watch the "Young School", it is not difficult to find them similar funny place, are they using the most plain, looks like a fairy-tale tells of the serious issues of faith. They allow the audience to another point of view, the perception can be used to understand the fact that we are angry and uneven.
Chinese saying: "fearless", inside the calves into a tiger, he will be afraid of the tiger? Since each person's faith is not the same, so it is difficult to evaluate and the value of life. As a lot of people say, the palace of the "modern" opera, are reflecting the humanity of the "modern" society, so to get a hot rod. When a juvenile fairy tales reflect adult survival course, mature people are Ling can believe that this world is really "God".
If faith created a war, then there is no belief in creation is the seller. Ang Lee 'Junior School "and he works hard to get past my sympathy, probably because our beliefs are not the same. Although I like a fairy tale, but like the fairy tale is not equivalent to accept the fairy tale. Questioned history to question the beliefs, stick to our principles to give up the principle of reforming its own set of philosophies of life. We all have to admit that, whether it is as a god, or cannibalism, a blessing or a curse: "When beasts alive or dead good man, we are constantly convince myself to rationalize their behavior.
We have faith, "what goes around, comes around," and so to say, has been unable to intimidate anyone. If a person can not become friends, like teenagers and Tiger, even if the day is not dead you, man may not live long. Conversely, in order to survive, the desire for production, cannibalism what did it matter. The day does not help you, people always want to help themselves, can live under in order to prove that God is there. The people thirst for life, often than people can imagine. For faith is not the same? People can lose their lives for their faith, to sacrifice themselves for the beliefs of others. In the final analysis, we are nothing but want to prove that their own beliefs are correct.
No comments:
Post a Comment